{"vuid":"VU#516627","idnumber":"516627","name":"Microsoft Internet Explorer fails to properly restrict access to frames","keywords":["Microsoft","Internet Explorer","iframe","ghost-buster","keystroke logging"],"overview":"Microsoft Internet Explorer fails to properly restrict access to a document's frames, which may allow an attacker to modify the contents of frames in a different domain.","clean_desc":"Frames in HTML documents are subdivisions of the current window. The most common use of frames in web pages is the IFRAME, or inline frame. IFRAMEs can be used to display content from a different domain within the physical representation of the current web page. A common example of the use of an IFRAME in a web page is to display a banner advertisement from a third party. Microsoft Internet Explorer fails to properly restrict access to a document's frames. This can allow an attacker to replace the contents of a web page's frame with arbitrary content. Internet Explorer still appears to enforce the cross-domain security model, which limits the actions that a malicious frame can take with the parent document. For example, a frame that exists in a different domain should not be able to access the parent document's cookies or HTML content, or other domain-specific DOM components. However, components that are not tied to a specific domain, such as the onmousedown event can be accessed. By monitoring this particular event, an IFRAME can capture keystrokes from the parent document. Other actions may be possible. Limited testing has shown that Internet Explorer 6, 7, and 8 beta 1 are vulnerable. Proof-of-concept code for this vulnerability is publicly available.","impact":"By convincing a user to view a specially crafted HTML document (e.g., a web page or an HTML email message), an attacker may be able to access non-domain-specific elements from a web page that exists in a different domain. For example, the attacker may be able to capture keystrokes while a user is interacting with a web page in a different domain.","resolution":"We are currently unaware of a practical solution to this problem. Please consider the following workarounds:","workarounds":"Disable Active Scripting This vulnerability can be mitigated by disabling Active Scripting in the Internet Zone, as specified in the \"Securing Your Web Browser\" document.","sysaffected":"","thanks":"This vulnerability was publicly disclosed by Eduardo Vela.","author":"This document was written by Will Dormann.","public":["http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/ghost-busters/","http://sirdarckcat.blogspot.com/2008/05/ghosts-for-ie8-and-ie75730.html","http://sirdarckcat.blogspot.com/2008/05/browsers-ghost-busters.html","http://secunia.com/advisories/30851/","http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html","http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537026(VS.85).aspx"],"cveids":[""],"certadvisory":"","uscerttechnicalalert":null,"datecreated":"2008-06-27T12:04:13Z","publicdate":"2008-05-12T00:00:00Z","datefirstpublished":"2008-06-27T13:03:21Z","dateupdated":"2008-07-15T17:47:25Z","revision":6,"vrda_d1_directreport":"0","vrda_d1_population":"4","vrda_d1_impact":"2","cam_widelyknown":"20","cam_exploitation":"0","cam_internetinfrastructure":"7","cam_population":"20","cam_impact":"6","cam_easeofexploitation":"20","cam_attackeraccessrequired":"18","cam_scorecurrent":"21.87","cam_scorecurrentwidelyknown":"21.87","cam_scorecurrentwidelyknownexploited":"38.07","ipprotocol":"","cvss_accessvector":"","cvss_accesscomplexity":"","cvss_authentication":null,"cvss_confidentialityimpact":"","cvss_integrityimpact":"","cvss_availabilityimpact":"","cvss_exploitablity":null,"cvss_remediationlevel":"","cvss_reportconfidence":"","cvss_collateraldamagepotential":"","cvss_targetdistribution":"","cvss_securityrequirementscr":"","cvss_securityrequirementsir":"","cvss_securityrequirementsar":"","cvss_basescore":"","cvss_basevector":"","cvss_temporalscore":"","cvss_environmentalscore":"","cvss_environmentalvector":"","metric":21.87,"vulnote":null}